AMBUSHED BY
A “CHAPERONE"
How to resolve the issue
by RG
Moderators note: This post is anonymous at the request of the author. However his actual identity is known to one of us.
For more background on this topic refer to the article on chaperones and the article on privacy complaints.
I get my most of my health care from a large group
practice in the town where I live; one of my two
primary care providers there was a female
nurse-practitioner who I’d been seeing for 5-6 years and had a good professional
relationship with. Last summer, I was taking a shower and noticed a large
swelling on one of my testicles. Knowing this was not something I could put
off, I immediately made an appointment with my NP, who fortunately was able to
see me that same morning. I was a little self-conscious about being examined by
her, but based on our prior history – and the fact that I’d had intimate exams
from other female doctors over the years -- I figured I could get over myself.
Anyway, after talking with me briefly about the swelling
I’d noticed, she got up and went to the sink to wash her hands. “When was the
last time you had a testicular exam?” she asked. Not exactly an announcement of
what she planned to do; on the other hand, I knew it was coming, so I wasn’t
surprised. “This will be my first,” I said. She nodded, then instructed me to
take my pants and underwear down to my ankles, lie down on the examining table,
and cover myself with a large cloth. She left the room for a few minutes while
I did so. But then, when she knocked and opened the door again, one of the
intake nurses (also female) was right behind her. Without a word, they
positioned themselves on either side of me, directly across from each other at
my hips. Then the NP pulled the drape completely off me, exposing my genitals
to both women. I was so shocked and embarrassed I literally couldn’t speak –
the NP hadn’t said anything beforehand about bringing in a witness, and
obviously hadn’t asked my permission for someone else to be in the room. Before
this experience, I had never even heard of “chaperones,” and had never been
undressed in a doctor’s office for anyone but that doctor. The other thing that
bothered me was that the nurse literally did nothing the entire time but stand
there staring at my exposed equipment. She did not say a word to me or make eye
contact at any point, and wasn’t assisting the NP in any way. As soon as the
exam was finished, she turned and left the room.
The swelling turned out to be a cyst, and I was referred
to a (male) urologist who recommended surgery to remove it. That took up most
of my attention for the next several weeks, during which time I noticed some
glaring differences from my initial exam in terms of modesty acknowledgement. I’ll
just give you two examples. First, a female ultrasound technician who not only didn’t
demand a witness, but made sure to drape me in such a way that only my
testicles were exposed and nothing else (not even my bare thighs), and only
while she was actually examining me. When she had to stop for a few minutes to
check her records, she readjusted the drape so that I was completely covered
until she returned to resume the ultrasound. Secondly, in the recovery room after my surgery,
the nurse attending me asked if I would like her to change places with my wife
when getting dressed to leave – an offer I gratefully accepted. Gradually, as I pieced together my memories of
the initial exam, I began to realize how seriously and unnecessarily my privacy
had been violated. At that point, I sent a letter to the NP, asking why the
nurse had been present and why I hadn’t been consulted about it. She replied in
a 4-line email stating that it was her “policy” to have a witness present
whenever patients were undressed, that it was “for your protection as well as mine,”
and recommending that I see a different provider in future for intimate exams. I
took her advice a bit further, and sent her another note terminating our
relationship. I obtained a copy of her clinical note for the exam, which to my
surprise did not list the name or credentials of the witness, just the phrase
“Chaperone during exam: female present.”
I went back to the facility in person to get that information; the clerk
I spoke with seemed surprised that I was asking, but obliged me.
Since the NP’s response was so unsatisfactory, I decided
to follow Dr. Joel Sherman’s recommendations (see
http://patientprivacyreview.blogspot.com/2010/10/privacy-complaints-what-to-do-about.html),
and gradually worked my way up through their chain of command (threatening to
file a complaint with the state medical board probably helped). Ultimately, I
was invited to meet with their two top directors. I told them I preferred not
to seek disciplinary action, but did require an acknowledgement that both their
NP and their nurse had acted improperly, along with some meaningful protections
that would keep me from being placed in that situation again. I pointed out the
implicit double standard in allowing two female staff members to attend an
undressed male patient; they agreed that the reverse situation would never be
allowed to happen at their facility, but said that the small number of male nurses
on their staff made that double standard difficult to avoid. I offered to sign
an a priori waiver of legal liability in exchange for a universal exemption
from “chaperones” in their practice, but they did not agree to it. Their
position was that individual providers had a right to third-party witnesses if
they desired. Instead, they told me they would post a note in my electronic
chart so that any provider in their practice would know my wishes in advance;
they also agreed to attach a letter from my therapist, stating that the
presence of such third-party observers was emotionally harmful for me. Their
thinking was that any provider seeing that information would be likely to
respect my preference and not be worried that I was just looking for a way to
trap them into a lawsuit.
At my request, they also gave me some advice for
negotiating with any new providers: if circumstances permitted, I should
arrange for an “establish care visit” in which the provider and I addressed my
refusal of witnesses and came to some agreement in advance about how to
proceed. In the event of an urgent situation, such as I’d had with my cyst, and
the new provider was not willing to work without a “
chaperone,”
I could ask that provider to switch places with a colleague who would honor my
wishes, so that I wouldn’t have to delay treatment by rescheduling.
In our meeting, the directors also announced that they
were planning to train their entire staff in proper chaperoning protocols –
something they admitted they had not done previously. I asked for, and
subsequently received, a copy of the informational materials they developed for
this training. To their credit, every one of my complaints is being addressed:
providers know they have to announce their intention to have an observer
beforehand and specifically ask for consent; “chaperones” themselves are
explicitly instructed to be attentive to patients’ signs of vulnerability and embarrassment,
and to provide reassurance -- verbally and by maintaining eye contact. The
training materials also clearly state that opposite-sex witnessesc are equally
inappropriate for male and female patients, thus apparently ending that
double-standard at their institution. I sent a written reply, thanking them and
commending them specifically for their progressive stance on male modesty.
In closing, I’d like to offer my thanks to Mr. Capra for
hosting this site, and to everyone else who has posted here. Your thoughts and
shared wisdom helped me learn how to advocate for myself, and to believe that
change is possible if one is willing to help make it possible.